Rabu, 21 September 2016

SEMANTICS AND TRANSLATION



A.       Semantics          
a.      Definition of Semantics
According to Oxford Advanced Learner Dictionary, semantics is “1. The study of the meanings of words and phrases, 2. The meaning of words, phrases or systems.”[1]
According to Charles, “Semantics is the systematic study of meaning, and linguistic semantics is the study of how languages organize and express meanings.”[2]
According to Palmer, “Semantics is technical term used to refer to the study o meaning.”[3] While according to Wagiman, “Semantics is the study of meaning in language.”[4]
From the explanation above, it can be concluded that semantics is a term refer to study of meaning in language.
b.      Meaning is complicated
A word’s meaning cannot be simply gained by consulting the dictionary, because the dictionary definitions of a word are “context-free”, e.g.:
1Out in the west where men are men.
2Do you mean funny, peculiar, or funny, ha ha?
3 He helped many young writers to find themselves and then to find publishers.
In the above examples, the two men, funny, and find have different meanings, and it is just through this difference of meaning that the effect of humor is achieved. No wonder that Wittgenstein said, “The meaning of a word is its use in the language.”(Wittgenstein, 1953)
In deciding the precise meaning, we would have to distinguish different kinds of meanings. Besides, the semantic relations should also be taken into consideration, such as polysemy, synonymy, antonymy, etc..
c.       Different types of meanings
Meaning is complicated. The first difficulty in the study of meaning is that the word “meaning” itself has many different meanings. In their book the Meaning of Meaning written in 1923, C. K. Ogden and I. A. Richards presented 16 major categories of them, with sub-categories all together, numbering 22.


Different linguists have categorized multiple types of meanings.
1.      Charles Morris’ three types of meanings
According to Charles Morris, there are three types of meanings: referential meaning (the relationship between signs and entities in the world), pragmatic meaning (the relationship between signs and their users; it includes identificational meaning, expressive meaning, associative meaning, social meaning, and imperative meaning), and intralingual meaning (the relationship between different signs; it includes phonological meaning, graphemic meaning, morphological or lexemic meaning, syntactic meaning, and discoursal or textual meaning).
2.      G. Leech’s seven types of meanings
Leech identified seven types of meanings. They are: conceptual meaning (logical, cognitive, or denotative content), connotative meaning (what is communicated by virtue of what language refers to), social meaning (what is communicated of the social circumstances of language use), affective meaning (what is communicated of the feeling and attitudes of the speaker/writer), reflected meaning (what is communicated through association with another sense of the same expression), collocative meaning (what is communicated through association with words which tend to occur in the environment of another word), thematic meaning(what is communicated by the way in which the message is organized in terms of order and emphasis). Types 2-6 are also categorized as associative meaning.
3.      Peter Newmark’s model of meaning
There are three types of meanings according to Newmark: expressive meaning, informative meaning, and vocative meaning.
4.      Roman Jakobson’s model of meaning
Jakobson classified meanings into 6 types: expressive meaning, informative meaning, vocative meaning, aesthetic meaning, phatic meaning, and metalinguistic meaning.
These different types of meaning are not classified according to the same criteria, and different linguists have different opinions for classifying meanings. Thus some types of meaning are overlapping, which causes much confusion.
All these meanings can be stratified into lexical, phraseological (idiomatic), sentential (prepositional), and discourse meaning. Lexical meaning includes denotational, connotational, affective, collocational, metaphorical, and cultural meaning, and discourse meaning includes literary (hermeneutically construed) and epistemic (analytically construed) meaning.
B.     Translation
a.      Definition of Translation
According to Oxford Advanced Learner Dictionary, 1. translation is “ Process changing someting that is written or spoken into another language. 2. A text or work that has been changed from one language into another.”[5]
According to Peter Newmark, translation is “rendering the meaning of a text into another language in the way that the author intended the text” (Peter Newmark, 1988: 4).
From the explanation above, it can be concluded that translation is process changing the meaning of something from one language into another language, it is not only text or written but also spoken.
C.      Relationship between Semantic and Translation
Semantics is a part that cannot be separated with translation . talking translation must be combine with talking semantics because the purpose of translation has closed relationship with term transfer meaning that included to one language into another language.
According to Nida (1975) in Rudolf Nababan, “A word can have many defferent meanings.”[6]  Rudolf states that “Meaning of a word is not only influenced by the position in a sentence but also influenced by science field that use the word.”[7] Further, he states that sometimes meaning of a word is decided by the situation and culture.[8]
For example:
1.      He sat on the chair.
2.      He has the chair of philosophy at the university.
3.      He will chair the meeting
4.      He was condemned to the chair.
If that sentences are translated into Indonesian so the translation are
1.      Dia duduk di kursi
2.      Dia menjabat mahaguru dalam ilmu filsafat di universitas itu.
3.      Dia akan memimpin rapat itu.
4.      Dia dihukum mati dikursi listrik.
Practically, a translator is not only focused on transfer meaning of a word. His attention extend to transfer massage. It can be seen below:
a.       Lexical meaning
Lexical meaning is meaning that is included in dictionary. For example: bad have meaning jahat, buruk, jelek, susah, tidak enak, busuk. It cannot be known surely what the meaning is. It can be understood when word bad stay in a sentence.
b.      Gramatical meaning
Gramatical meaning relate to word class in a sentence. For example: can have meaning bisa or dapat, kaleng, mengalengkan. That meaning depend on the class or position of a word in a sentence. Word can in sencente “ They can the fish” has function as a predicate or verb.
c.       Contextual meaning
Contextual meaning relate to the contex or the situation when the word is used. For example: Good morning  is not always translated selamat pagi. That utterance  can be translated to keluar! If that utterance said by the chief to his employee that always come late.
From the explanation above it can be conclude that Translation is the transfer of meaning, and semantic analysis is an important way of defining meaning, which can help us to have a better understanding of the source text. We should combine the translation studies with linguistics, and try to use the discoveries of the linguistics to help the study of translation.

Conclusion
Semantics is a term refer to study of meaning in language. A word’s meaning cannot be simply gained by consulting the dictionary, because the dictionary definitions of a word are “context-free”. Meaning is complicated. The first difficulty in the study of meaning is that the word “meaning” itself has many different meanings.
Ttranslation is process changing the meaning of something from one language into another language, it is not only text or written but also spoken.
Semantics is a part that cannot be separated with translation. A translator is not only focused on transfer meaning of a word. His attention extend to transfer massage. It can be seen below:
a.       Lexical meaning is meaning that is included in dictionary. For example: bad have meaning jahat, buruk, jelek, susah, tidak enak, busuk. It cannot be known surely what the meaning is. I
b.      Gramatical meaning relate to word class in a sentence. For example: can have meaning bisa or dapat, kaleng, mengalengkan.
c.       Contextual meaning relate to the contex or the situation when the word is used. For example: Good morning  is not always translated selamat pagi.
We should combine the translation studies with linguistics, and try to use the discoveries of the linguistics to help the study of translation
REFERENCES
As Hornby, Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010.

Charles Kreidler, Introducing English Semantics, Routledge, New York, 1998.
Palmer, SEMANTICS: Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1981.

Rudolf Nababan, Teori Menerjemah, cet. 3,  Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, 2008
Wagiman, SEMANTICS: An Introduction to the Basic Consepts, Penerbit andi, Yogyakarta, 2008


[1] As Hornby, Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010, p. 1342.
[2] Charles Kreidler, Introducing English Semantics, Routledge, New York, 1998, p.  3.
[3] Palmer, SEMANTICS: Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1981, p. 1.
[4] Wagiman, SEMANTICS: An Introduction to the Basic Consepts, Penerbit andi, Yogyakarta, 2008, p. 1.
[5] As Hornby, op. cit,  p. 1588.
[6] Rudolf Nababan, Teori Menerjemah, cet. 3,  Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, 2008, p. 47.
[7] Ibid.
[8] Ibid.

Senin, 19 September 2016

CRITICAL READING 2



CRITICAL READING 
 
A CRITICAL READING OF TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE INDIVIDUAL CASE STUDIES’ LITERACY PERFORMANCE AND THEIR USE OF COMPUTER TOOLS
Dr. Odette Bourjaili Radi (PhD)
ISBN: 978-989-8533-23-4 © 2014 IADIS

The aim of this study was to investigate how the use of computer based-spelling checkers related to the student language literacy development. The researcher used method of qualitative and quantitative method. Test was used to know student students’ reading and writing performance. Survey was used to know student perception of tools usefulness. The teacher were surveyed and interviewed to investigate students’ performance of reading and writing.
 The test showed that the students are classified to six 3 level. Teachers’ view showed that reading and writing achievement of high level students were high standard. It was very different among high student, medium students and lower students. The result test was decrease. The high student had high frequency in reading book so the quality of reading and writing performance were high while medium and lower student use computer grammar checked and had lower frequency in reading book. Moreover, high level students were self-motivated in reading book, while medium and lower students were lack-motivated in reading book. The medium student found that reading were boring even lower student did not read book at all.
Based on the finding above, it shows that computer cannot be separated in children’s life. As the effect of addicting digital technology, children are more susceptible to exploit electronical device such as cumputer to build self identity and community (Mountifield: 2006). The use computer has reduced reading culture and it makes students think practically to use computer in every aspect.
This study is very useful and we can do more research about this topic. The research can be conducted in Indonesia where computer have been practically used by many students. The case study is more appropriate to teenager student because most of them have their own computer. The research will help the teacher to find more effective way to motivate students to increase their reading activity and stimulus student to use their computer wisely. 

                                                                                                 

                                                                                     By: Khoirunnisa


Jumat, 16 September 2016


CRITICAL READING 1

VOCATIONAL COLLEGE STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF A NEWLY IMPLEMENTED ONLINE COURSE OF TEACHING ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE
Written by: Abdullah Yƶrdem  
Publisher: International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching
August 2015, 3/2, p. 1-9

            Some of people argue that using online course is a good solution to make distance learning. Godwin-Jones (2003) claims that language instruction enable delivered by using internet and it will have less cost, thus educational institutions have opportunities to deliver course online. To prove this claim, some of research was held in a lot of universities. The researchers have found that most of student agree and satisfy online courses in language learning.
In the same topic, Abdullah Yordem tried to do more research about online course. The goal of his study is to investigate about students’ arguments of online course used in English teaching. Many arguments and perspectives appeared unpredictably in finding. It showed the opposite result of previous study about using online course. The students preferred to use traditional method in teaching English as a foreign language. Most of the student argued that they cannot understand well without class environment even only few students felt more comfort with online course.
This study is very interesting because the finding is opposite to the previous. If we conduct this research in Indonesia, it will be more interesting. Remember that computer and good internet connection only served in a few regions of Indonesia, for instance: Jakarta. While the others region have limited facilities. Based on that problem, we can investigate more and compare it with the previous study. We will know the perceptions of Indonesian student about online course in English teaching. Is the result will be same or quite different? What is the biggest obstacle doing online course in Indonesia?

                                                                       
                                               
                                                                                                   By: Khoirunnisa

Masuk angin

Angin tiba tiba menyelinap ke dalam pori memasuki ruang-ruang kosong, menyesaki paru hingga sesak untuk dihembuskan. Menerawang jauh de...